Comments on: Minimum Browser Size http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/ feels like you punching me in face with orange Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:44:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ray http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31713 Ray Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:22:58 +0000 http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31713 Wow, I wouldn't have thought the screen size would be this small. I mean, this ->http://www.theroadtoonlinesuccess.biz/images/462px.jpg is the biggest image on average that people can see? I do have a couple of questions, does that include the surf frame(s)? or is that pre-surf frame, but including all the toolbars people sometimes clutter their lives with... :-) Interesting. Ray Wow, I wouldn't have thought the screen size would be this small. I mean, this ->http://www.theroadtoonlinesuccess.biz/images/462px.jpg is the biggest image on average that people can see?

I do have a couple of questions, does that include the surf frame(s)? or is that pre-surf frame, but including all the toolbars people sometimes clutter their lives with... :-)

Interesting.

Ray

]]> By: Soren Jordansen http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31173 Soren Jordansen Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:49:49 +0000 http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31173 The big question for me here is... Are people cheating? Or why is the number so low? And is there anything I can do prevent this form of cheating on <a>Dragon Surf</a>? The big question for me here is... Are people cheating? Or why is the number so low?
And is there anything I can do prevent this form of cheating on Dragon Surf?

]]> By: Ruth Sharp http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31168 Ruth Sharp Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:58:31 +0000 http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31168 I think the minimum window size should be a percentage of the total since there are so many different sizes and ages of monitors out there. 75% of the available space seems like a good amount to me. My monitor is 17" and the actual screen height is about 10 1/4". So 75% for my monitor is just over 7.8". I don't know the exact pixel amount that would be. I try to make my splash pages no larger than 6-7" and even then I'm sure the whole splash isn't seen in a lot of browser windows. I would think a window smaller than 450 would be too small to effectively advertise but who really knows? Ruth I think the minimum window size should be a percentage of the total since there are so many different sizes and ages of monitors out there. 75% of the available space seems like a good amount to me.
My monitor is 17" and the actual screen height is about 10 1/4". So 75% for my monitor is just over 7.8". I don't know the exact pixel amount that would be.
I try to make my splash pages no larger than 6-7" and even then I'm sure the whole splash isn't seen in a lot of browser windows.
I would think a window smaller than 450 would be too small to effectively advertise but who really knows?
Ruth

]]> By: Ruth Sharp http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31165 Ruth Sharp Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:42:16 +0000 http://www.timlinden.com/blog/traffic-exchanges/minimum-browser-size/#comment-31165 Thanks for the 1000 hits Tim! I love StartXchange! I figured there are a lot of small monitors out there, plus toolbars, etc. eating up the space. Ruth Thanks for the 1000 hits Tim! I love StartXchange!
I figured there are a lot of small monitors out there, plus toolbars, etc. eating up the space.
Ruth

]]>