Comments on: Lords-Of-Traffic Review

By: Armi Niemi

Armi Niemi — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:38:29 +0000

All controversy aside, I just checked my signup tracking for this month and Lord-Of-Traffic is performing the best (way above the rest) out of all traffic exchanges I promote in in giving new signups to my programs.

This is just one reason of the very many for me to keep using it :)

Armi Niemi

By: Solomon Huey

Solomon Huey — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:16:34 +0000

I hear a lot of great things about LOT, but yea the single button does concern me a lot (Did I just make a pun? :P )

I honestly haven’t signed up because of that. But I’d be very willing to give it a try if they adjusted that somehow.

By: Edwin (Holidayfreak)

Edwin (Holidayfreak) — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:18:34 +0000

Well Tim,

it appears to me that anti-cheat are being changed to more frequent the last days. :-)
I see them now about every 20 to 30 sites.

By: Yvonne Akery

Yvonne Akery — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:00:22 +0000

I like Lords Of Traffic also. It is an interesting site and different games come up to play.

And Like Surfer Dad said Kjell is always there and you can always get a response from him quickly through the site support system. Usually replies to my support ticket within a couple of hours and never more than 24 hours depending on the time zone difference.

Yvonne

By: Thomas O'Keefe

Thomas O'Keefe — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:48:39 +0000

I totally disagree with Tims review of LOT. I love this site and find Kjell to be concerned and hands on in regards to communicating with his members. Kjell has a great cheater concept that challenges the surfer, but does it so fast that you actually gain credits in the process—I love the chat–both site and team chat—Kjell is always talking to his members and problems get solved. I find this site to be one of the top sites of it’s kind—-I can not wait to surf, compete and chat——-

By: Edwin (Holidayfreak)

Edwin (Holidayfreak) — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:07:36 +0000

Hi Tim,

you might be right about ability to cheat, but still surfing is intevered with code to be typed randomly.
So when someone is cheating with macro’s, it can only be done for a random amount of websites.
When inactivity is a result of that, the cheater will have to relogin after certain time of inactivity.

Probably there are smart cheaters out there, but I think they are not the majority. My websites in rotation still get exposure, even when a few viewers are cheating.

Anyway, thanks for sharing your opinion.

And if you don’t want to expose your link, why not add mine (just kidding).

Regards,

Edwin